The Humanities Vs. The Sciences: Who Wins Out?

Shutterstock
Shutterstock

This spring, I’m going to have finally earned my Bachelor’s of Arts in Gender and Women’s Studies with a concentration on race and ethnicity. This field is something I’m incredibly passionate about, because gender, race, class and all other social systems shape our experiences as individuals.

I myself am privileged, growing up in an upper-middle class environment and being able to graduate with no debt, which is something I know is rare and do not take for granted whatsoever. I’m also white (a white Latina; I’m still figuring out the best way to identify myself) or at least “white-passing”, among many other privileges I have. I’m also a woman, which puts me at a certain disadvantage. My privileges do not cancel out the oppression I face as a woman.

And THIS is why I study what I study. My academic field as widened my eyes and I think has made me a better person, with more empathy for others and a better understanding of how institutions shape our daily lives.

I think my education is incredibly important and that’s why it bothers me when people point blank tell me that my field of study isn’t as important as a STEM field. I’m not writing this to say which is better: STEM or the humanities, because they are like apples and oranges, they simply do not compare to one another. STEM is important, that’s how we get our infrastructure, our medicines, our technology and many more things we take for granted. But the humanities are important too: without them we wouldn’t have domestic violence shelters, social workers, counselors, teachers, theorists like bell hooks and Patricia Hill Collins. I’m not writing this to claim that the humanities and social sciences are more important than STEM, because that’s untrue and incredibly biased: we are just different.

STEM is short for the field of studies involving science, technology, engineering and mathematics. The humanities include fields like ethnic studies, gender and women’s studies, philosophy, literature, and more. These fields of study don’t necessarily produce tangible goods and products, like STEM fields do. Bridges aren’t designed, neither are cars. Medicines aren’t invented and the next Steve Jobs surely isn’t coming from a humanities background. We are the teachers, the writers, the artists, the social workers, the theorists (not to say that people in STEM can’t be theorists, but not of the likes of bell hooks or Michel Foucault) and more. We are less likely to make a lot of money and create tangible products.

For some people like myself, going into the STEM field, while more fiscally rewarding, simply isn’t feasible. I’ve failed nearly every math class I’ve taken, struggled with basic biology, let alone balancing chemical equations. Would you trust me to help engineer a bridge or design some cutting edge technology when I can’t even grasp the concept of a logarithm (really, WHAT IS THE POINT OF THOSE THINGS?)? My brain doesn’t function that way. But I can write, I can copy edit, and I can read Judith Butler and pretty much understand what she has to say (which is no small feat, let me tell you). I can debate, make presentations and lead discussions and dialogues.

I think one of the reasons why humanities are considered to be “soft” and “less important” than STEM of “hard sciences” is because they are seen as a more feminine field of study. In our society, we associate masculinity with discussion based around facts rather than emotion, truth being black or white, and objectivity. Because of these societal expectations, STEM is seen as a more valid field of study because it encapsulates all these things. Men are encouraged to go into these fields, and women re discouraged from early on to prefer subjects like English and History. Humanities are seen as feminine because a lot of times there is no “true” answer, and everything is in shades of grey. There is no objectivity, everything is subjective. In the humanities we discuss nuances, emotions, and other things that are seen as feminine, with even our discussion styles based around the idea of consciousness raising. Women predominantly make up the pool of people who work in these fields, much more than men. Because we live in a patriarchal society that devalues femininity at every turn, it’s no wonder why the humanities are seen as less important than STEM, for two reasons: the method in which we learn and explore, and who ultimately ends up taking these jobs.

My work and goals aren’t any less important than the non-humanities, they’re just different. I want to work at a domestic violence shelter. I want to eventually be a professor. I want to help others in my local community. It’s something a lot smaller, and less tangible, but it’s what I’m passionate about. And that’s okay. I’ve been called a bleeding heart, not as a compliment, and every time I can’t help but wonder why is that bad? I’m happy doing what I do, and it’s not any less valid than the people out there doing STEM work. It’s not any less or more important.

Both are necessary in our society, so can we not pit them against each other? TC mark

More From Thought Catalog

  • http://moonchildstories.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/construction-of-scotland-class-reflective-blog/ Construction of Scotland Class Reflective Blog. | moon child.

    […] Vs. The Sciences: Who Wins Out?’ Skylar Grogan, February 12 2014, Thought Catalog Website. https://thoughtcatalog.com/skylar-grogan/2014/02/the-humanities-vs-the-sciences-who-wins-out/ • ‘Dead Poets Society – Mr. Keating’s Walt Whitman Speech’ YouTube Video. […]

  • https://moonchildwriter.wordpress.com/2014/12/27/construction-of-scotland-class-reflective-blog/ Construction of Scotland Class: Reflective Blog | moon child...

    […] Vs. The Sciences: Who Wins Out?’ Skylar Grogan, February 12 2014, Thought Catalog Website. https://thoughtcatalog.com/skylar-grogan/2014/02/the-humanities-vs-the-sciences-who-wins-out/ • ‘Dead Poets Society – Mr. Keating’s Walt Whitman Speech’ YouTube Video. […]

  • http://writingexpedition.com/2016/03/22/us-anti-intellectualism-through-a-glass-darkly-the-end-of-our-national-self-inquiry/ US anti-intellectualism through a glass darkly: the end of our national self-inquiry. | The Writing Expedition

    […] How much would you pay to stay out of the rat race for 4 years, talking about ideas while learning how to communicate, lead others, and discover what really makes you tick?  Sounds priceless to me.  But maybe “priceless” doesn’t mean you want to go into debt for the rest of your life.  When the anti-intellectuals use ROI as an argument against the Academy, what they’re really talking about is student debt vs. the state of the economy.  And they’re conflating these things in an argument against all “useless college degrees” because humanistic inquiry runs contrary to the business values congruent with STEM. […]

blog comments powered by Disqus