Thought Catalog

Let’s Talk About Reproductive Rights And Why Men Should Have Them Too

  • 0
Untitled
via Flickr Commons

The World Health Organization defines reproductive rights as “rest[ing] on the recognition of the basic right of all couples and individuals to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing, and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so, and the right to attain the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health. They also include the right of all to make decisions concerning reproduction free of discrimination, coercion, and violence.

The right to make decisions regarding reproduction free of discrimination, coercion and violence. No one in their right mind, surely, would ever argue that women should be coerced into parenthood simply by virtue of the fact that they are women, nor would anyone argue that women who refuse to accept parenthood should be arrested and jailed or otherwise treated with any kind of violence, state-sanctioned or otherwise. But that is exactly what happens to men.

I am a staunch defender of women’s right to bodily autonomy, including the right to discontinue any pregnancy that is happening in her body. I don’t particularly require the sophistry of fetus or clump of cells or potential human being to support abortion rights. I have no problem accepting that abortion is killing a human baby. I don’t think that’s a relevant fact, and it is certainly not one that trumps a woman’s right to bodily autonomy. That human baby cannot exist without her body, and her body belongs to her full stop. I do not believe any person, man or woman, should be able to force a woman to carry through with a pregnancy, so obviously, I do not accept any arguments that men should have a say over abortion as valid.

I’m a lot more interested in what happens when a woman decides that yes, the pregnancy will continue and a live child will be produced. At that point, what options does a woman have if she prefers not to parent that child?

8594644828_e39c8f2a12_z

Let’s start with legal parental surrender, normally identified as Safe Haven laws. These laws allow women of infants of varying ages (it depends on the state) to leave an otherwise unharmed infant in a designated spot, at which point she is absolved of all social, legal, financial and moral responsibility. The laws were enacted to prevent women from simply abandoning infants they did not want. Four states are very explicit that only women may take advantage of haven laws (Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota and Tennessee) but the rest use the word “parent”, which is obviously gender neutral. But in practice, no father can surrender his infant without the mother’s explicit permission, so these laws are de facto only available to women.

Women are also under no legal requirement to identify the father of their child and if the father is not listed on the birth certificate, he has no legal rights at all. Certainly men can pursue legal rights by establishing paternity, but it is up to men to enforce their rights. Women can, and do, surrender infants for adoption without notifying or identifying the father of the child. These are very high risk adoptions for the adopting couple, because there is always a chance the father will appear and attempt to assert his rights, but the fact remains that women can, once again, relieve themselves of all social, legal, financial and moral responsibility for a child they do not want.

Men cannot do any of those things. They have no say in abortion, which is correct and right. But once a living, breathing child exists, only the mother can legally absolve herself of all responsibility for that child.

The most common argument against men having reproductive rights is the old “keep it in your pants” one, which we would never accept as an argument for why women should be forced into parenthood. Having sex is not consent to parenthood for women, so why should it be for men? The next level of argument is that “only women can get pregnant” but there is no direct relationship between pregnancy and parenthood, as all the step, foster and adoptive mothers can tell you. We could, theoretically, allow women abortions, so they can avoid pregnancy, but still require them to legally adopt a child from the foster care system, for example, for every abortion they have. This is rather like the situation men find themselves in. Would we ever in a million years suggest this is a rational or sane thing to do?

The fact is that birth control fails. It also gets sabotaged. Condoms break. Vasectomies don’t work. There is no 100% way to prevent pregnancy for either men or women, other than complete celibacy. When those failures happen, women have at least three different ways to reject the responsibility of parenthood and men have none. There is a word for forcing men to accept responsibility for a child they did not intend and do not want: coercion. The WHO says reproductive rights require that no person be coerced into parenthood, meaning that men do not have reproductive rights, as long as that coercion exists.

8594644828_e39c8f2a12_z

So what is the solution? What would reproductive rights look like for men? Well, rather similar to what they look like for women. When an unplanned, unwanted pregnancy occurs, the woman, and only the woman will decide if her body will host that pregnancy to term. But even after the child is born, she may opt out of parenting that child by surrendering it for adoption. If men had the same rights, they too would be able to legally surrender their rights and allow the mother or any other individual to assume legal responsibility for the child.

It’s not even that hard to administer. Do you or do you not wish to assume responsibility for this child? But it hits on an uncomfortable truth. Culturally, we seem to think that men are utilities and that children belong to their mothers and are entitled by birth to male resources. Men are not allowed to choose parenthood, but will instead have their rights trampled in the “best interests of the child”, a condition that does not apply to women. It’s hardly in the “best interests of the child” to be aborted before birth, and we do not hold women to that standard because their bodily autonomy trumps the best interests of the child.

If our goal as a society is to move towards one in which every child is wanted by both parents, then granting men reproductive rights would be a huge step in that direction. Knowing that men can and will surrender parental rights will likely motivate both parents to carefully consider the ramifications of bringing children into this world. Of course, reproductive rights for men must be accompanied by reproductive rights for women, including access to safe, affordable reliable abortion services.

If the pro-choice community really wanted to see a huge leap in support for abortion and reproductive services for women, they would throw their weight behind reproductive rights for men.

As usual, when everyone has equal rights, we all come out ahead. TC mark

image – John Dill

Read This

More from Thought Catalog

Thought Catalog Videos


    • http://judgybitch.com/2014/05/31/look-another-thought-catalog-piece/ Look! Another Thought Catalog piece! | judgybitch
    • http://teejaw.com/parity-for-pro-choice-a-mans-right-to-choose/ Parity For Pro Choice — A Man’s Right to Choose - TeeJaw Blog

      […] Reposting again because others are talking about this: Having sex is not consent to parenthood for women, so why should it be for men? […]

    • http://paul-m-jones.org/archives/5205 Towards Reproductive Rights For Men | Paul M. Jones

      […] via Let’s Talk About Reproductive Rights And Why Men Should Have Them Too | Thought Catalog. […]

    • http://taoist.wordpress.com/2014/06/01/reproductive-rights-for-the-sexes/ Reproductive “Rights” For The Sexes | Tai-Chi Policy

      […] Compare and contrast. I’ll also note that it’s quite possible to have a different opinion on abortion, and agree with her the rest of the article. […]

    • http://pancakeloach.wordpress.com/2014/06/02/chilling/ Chilling | Something Fishy

      […] here’s an example, from a woman who argues that since women have multiple options to walk away from parenthood, men […]

    • http://romickinoakley.wordpress.com/2014/06/08/sunday-reading-060814/ Sunday Reading – 06/08/14 | Romick in Oakley

      […] It’s not even that hard to administer. Do you or do you not wish to assume responsibility for this child? But it hits on an uncomfortable truth. Culturally, we seem to think that men are utilities and that children belong to their mothers and are entitled by birth to male resources. Men are not allowed to choose parenthood, but will instead have their rights trampled in the “best interests of the child”, a condition that does not apply to women. It’s hardly in the “best interests of the child” to be aborted before birth, and we do not hold women to that standard because their bodily autonomy trumps the best interests of the child. Read More > at Thought Catalog […]

    • http://malemattersusa.wordpress.com/2014/06/14/lets-talk-about-reproductive-rights-and-why-men-should-have-them-too/ Let’s Talk About Reproductive Rights And Why Men Should Have Them Too |

      […] Janet Bloomfield | Thought Catalog | May 30, […]

    • http://judgybitch.com/2015/03/12/karen-straughan-wants-to-know-how-to-create-a-society-that-is-forced-to-care-about-men-i-have-some-ideas/ Karen Straughan wants to know how to create a society that is forced to care about men. I have some ideas….. | judgybitch

      […] and allowing men to walk away from children they have contributed genetic material to, just as women may do, but having given the issue more thought, I am convinced that will only lead to increased hatred of […]

    • http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/how-do-we-create-a-society-that-cares-about-men-it-might-be-easier-than-you-think/ How do we create a society that cares about men? It might be easier than you think.

      […] and allowing men to walk away from children they have contributed genetic material to, just as women may do, but having given the issue more thought, I am convinced that will only lead to increased hatred of […]

    • http://judgybitch.com/2015/03/13/jessica-valenti-coughs-up-a-ball-of-full-retard/ Jessica Valenti coughs up a ball of full retard | judgybitch

      […] hatred prevents men from choosing parenthood. Your hatred prevents men from seeing their children. Your hatred prevents […]

    • http://se.avoiceformen.com/feminism/nej-sa-mycket-jamstalldhet-vill-vi-inte-ha/ Nej! SÅ mycket jämställdhet vill vi inte ha – AVFM Sverige

      […] ansvar för barn som de har bidragit med genetiskt material till men inte samtyckt till, precis som kvinnor kan göra, men efter att ha gett frågan lite mer eftertanke, är jag övertygad om att det bara kommer att […]

    • https://thoughtcatalog.com/janet-bloomfield/2015/03/6-truths-about-dads-feminists-dont-want-you-to-know/ 6 Truths About Dads Feminists Don’t Want You to Know | Thought Catalog

      […] basic human right to have meaningful relationships with both their parents, and thanks to the total lack of reproductive rights for men, more men than women pay child support. The vast majority of non-custodial parents pay child […]

    • http://blog.panampost.com/frank-worley-lopez/2015/04/24/what-if-employees-were-treated-like-business-owners/ What If Employees Were Treated Like Business Owners?

      […] the right of women and men to make their own reproductive choices (rights, incidentally, that men do not currently have) and I think family leave is a good idea in theory, I see no reason why the employer […]

    • http://onlyslightlybiased.com/2016/01/men-heres-how-you-can-support-womens-reproductive-rights/ Men Supporting Women's Reproductive Rights

      […] sex does not constitute consent to parenthood, which in turn means “abstinence only” is not a solution to this problem. If preventing […]

    • http://www.empoweredmen.com/?p=66 Scorched Earth: HeForShe – Empowered Men

      […] Women have reproductive rights […]

    • http://www.empoweredmen.com/scorched-earth-heforshe/ Scorched Earth: HeForShe - Empowered Men

      […] Women have reproductive rights […]

    • http://www.viralwomen.com/should-male-abortions-be-legal-within-the-first-18-weeks/ Should ‘Male Abortions’ Be Legal Within The First 18 Weeks? | Viral Women

      […] group claims that allowing these male abortions would give equality for the sexes and let expectant mothers know if their partner is willing to commit to […]

    • https://www.avoiceformen.com/education/poisoning-the-wells-from-which-our-young-girls-drink/ Poisoning the wells from which our young girls drink
    • http://mohamedlabidi.wordpress.com labidi78

      Hey friend,

      Have you already seen that? It’s simply the coolest stuff I’ve ever seen! Just take a look here http://put.buffcreektax.com

      Regards, mohamed_labidi

    • http://misteri.newsbella.it/6-verita-sui-padri-negate-dal-femminismo/ 6 verità sui padri negate dal Femminismo |

      […] maggior parte dei padri sostengono finanziariamente i loro figli. Grazie alle leggi che rifiutano di riconoscere agli uomini uguaglianza nel ruolo di genitori, leggi che si rifiutano di anteporre il diritto del bambino ad avere pari relazioni significative […]

    • https://lifeloveandsecondchances.wordpress.com/2017/08/03/romantic-obsession/ Romantic Obsession – Life, Love, and Second Chances

      […] So how do you handle rejection? Me, when I went through heartbreak I generally handled it by crying pretty profusely for a few days, looking at their social media pages constantly, and when I was really at my most unstable, sending multiple text messages.  For me though, that was the extent of it.  I have seen so much more in the last few months/years that has been hard for me to watch.  Women faking pregnancies.  And not just pregnancies, mind you.  Faking medical documents to corroborate her story.  A fake ultrasound.  And then, the icing on the cake, revealing the gender of a baby that is not even in existence.  While it was definitely hard to watch a woman use that level of manipulation towards  person I love dearly, it also made me very sad for the woman.  As both our lawyer and therapist have stated, she is in desperate need of some mental health services.  For me the decision is easy: He doesn’t want you. Move on. You can’t force someone to want to be with you and even if you could, why would you want to? Forcing a life with a man who is not in love with you, and may not even like who you are as a person.  Let alone trying to trap a man with a child? Whether real or imaginary, that takes the entire situation to an entirely new level, and has led me to very seriously want to to look into advocacy for Male Reproductive Rights.  I have a lot more thoughts on this, but if you want to read more on that from someone who so eloquently hits the name on the head, click here […]

    • http:/thebucketlistofera.wordpress.com thebucketlistofera

      Hey!

      I guess I found something really helpful for you, take a peek, you won’t regret http://ooiweb.com/demo/bt/plugins/system/t3/base-bs3/html/layouts/libraries/cms/html/bootstrap/hbsly/bus.php?9293

      Cheers, Karin Lackey

    blog comments powered by Disqus