I don’t know whether Gaga’s procedure can be called systematic. Hell, I don’t even know if we can call it a procedure. This ain’t Claude Monet developing more exaggerated brush-strokes of light and shadow to render a stylized impression of landscapes. If anything, the Gaga schtick seems to flourish by virtue of it’s sharply asystematic, “WTF”-appeal.
There are some people whose works are – while largely erotica-free – overtly designed to gratify a certain sector of entertainment consumers, and do so with stimulating offerings inherently designed to “get people off”. These folks can be called non-sexual pornographers.