Don’t See Take This Waltz, Unless You Want To Hate Your Life For Two Hours

I was fully prepared to love the film, Take This Waltz. After all, it featured some of my favorite actors (Michelle Williams and Sarah Silverman) and was directed by Sarah Polley, the Canadian actress cum director of the understated and critically-acclaimed indie, Away From Her. What’s not to like? Plus, just watching the trailer made me feel 421 new feelings.

As it happened, Take This Waltz did end up making me feel a buffet of emotions but none of them were particularly good. Despite showcasing some great acting, especially from Seth Rogen and Silverman, the film failed to have any emotional resonance with me. Instead of working on character development and, you know, quality writing, Take This Waltz too often falls victim to the Quirky Indie Film problem — which is to say that it was all style and little substance.

The movie follows a 28-year-old woman named Margot, a travel writer who’s living in Toronto with her wonderful, understanding husband, Lou, while starting to develop feelings for her attractive neighbor, Daniel. The attraction is mutual between the two and the entire film tracks the ambivalence Margot feels for these two great albeit wildly diffeent men in her life.

Sounds fine, right? Like a solid love triangle? Well, it would be compelling if the character of Margot felt more real. Although I usually love Michelle Williams, the combination of her acting and this insufferable character made the movie hard to enjoy. Basically, Margot is a giant freak on a leash. She’s so delicate and strange that she does things like demanding to be pushed around in a wheelchair at airports, even though she’s able to walk just fine. (I know, soooooo strange and weird and deep, OMG. And look, she drinks milk on airplanes. WHO DOES THAT?! SHE’S SO FUNKY. DID YOU SEE THE WHEELCHAIR?) Other strange things that Margot likes to do: Blow on people’s faces, lay against her oven while making a sad face, sobbing every five minutes just ’cause, laughing maniacally after sobbing because life is so complex, speak in baby talk to her husband, and go on rollercoasters by herself and smile. In sum, Margot is all over the damn place. All of the characters at one point ask her if she’s out of her mind. To which Margot just responds with a quivering lip and a wan smile, as if to say, “Yes, I am. Isn’t it sooooo interesting?”

Making an indie film about a pretty girl who feels vague sadness 24/7 is nothing new. But you know what? I’m tired of it. As much as Polley tries to convince us, the character of Margot is NOT nuanced. Seriously, you can’t just have stellar cinematography and put on a Feist song, and expect me to believe that any of the stuff in this movie is deep or real. How about putting some meat on your character’s bones instead of making them all malnourished and vegan? I’m so sick of seeing faux-deep arthouse films that claim to be realistic depictions of life when, really, they just have a kickass soundtrack and some nice lighting. Watching Katy Perry’s whipped cream tits in 3D feels more authentic than seeing Michelle Williams and her manufactured quirkiness. Like, don’t try to convince me it’s kale when it’s actually cotton candy, okay? These types of meandering and pointless “quiet” films offend me more than some blockbuster popcorn movie because they’re claiming to be full of depth when they’re really just as shallow as anything else. When are filmmakers going to realize that a cute wardrobe and long dramatic pauses don’t make for a compelling character?

The bummer thing about Take This Waltz is that it actually had promise. Sarah Silverman’s turn as Geraldine, a charismatic recovering alcoholic sister-in-law, is electrifying and Luke Kirby is, quite frankly, sexy as hell and totally believable as the antidote to Rogen’s nice guy affability. It’s Margot, who’s supposed to serve as the emotional center, that rings shallow. Maybe if she spent more time articulating her feelings rather than looking pensively into the camera for ten minutes we would get more of an idea about who she really is and, thus, actually care about her. I don’t mean make her likable. A female character doesn’t need to be likable in order to be affective. In fact, it’s more interesting and progressive when they’re not. Just look at Charlize Theron’s amazing and unsympathetic performance in Young Adult. It’s just that if you’re going to structure an entire film around a character, you better give them something to do other than look confused while wearing a nice dress.TC Mark

image – Take This Waltz

Ryan O'Connell

I'm a brat.

Related

More From Thought Catalog

  • Andre

    Ouch! What a delightfully vicious review.

  • Amanda

    I hated this movie. Seriously. You hit the nail on the head with the wheelchair comment hahaha.

    The last 5 minutes where they just fuck around the house? I was like whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat is happening. I love a good random sex scene but jigga what?!

    • guest

      SPOILER

    • Guest

      Like for real, who actually writes a comment detailing the END of a movie. Total Spoiler!!!!!!!

  • Fred

    Michelle Williams gave her all trying to breathe life into Margo and making her as complex and humanized as possible. However, Sarah Polley avoided the hard questions as to why Margo feels that way in the first place. There were signs that it could be baby-related or that writing wasn’t really Margo’s passion. But, if the writing moved past illustrating emptiness and melancholic contemplation, then Margo might have been a more sympathetic character.

  • http://twitter.com/tr_sk_ys tres keys (@tr_sk_ys)

    What does it mean when you use “cum” as an adjective?

  • http://gravatar.com/lrmann lauren m.

    The only thing you’re missing is the mention of mucho bush. The shower scene sent me into a PTSD-induced frenzy, based on that one time I accidentally caught some 70’s porn. Old lady pubes galore, Michelle William’s impossibly trim bikini line and Sarah Silverman casually leaning over to shave her legs, if she can see them over her jungle of a crotch.

    Otherwise, I generally liked it.

  • Bernard

    Yes! Yes! Yes!
    Exactly what I thought too.

    That whole babytalk episode freaked me the fuck out.

    Also, I love Michelle Williams so frigging much but sometimes I miss simple ol’ Jen Lindley from the creek. She knew how to create REAL drama and would never have tolerated Margot’s bullshit. In fact, she probably would have thrown her of the nearest pier while drunkingly screaming : “DAWSON IS MINE!”

  • Mumblecore Is Better than Jean Renoir

    This movie is moronic but the writer of this piece seems to be 12. Like everyone 24 these days.

  • Guest

    Interesting review, but seeing two errors that could be fixed by spell check ruined it for me.

    I’m usually not nit-picky, but you made two mistakes that spell check would have picked up if you would have bothered to do it: “diffeent” in third paragraph should be “different and “affective” in last paragraph should be “effective.”

    I wish Thought Catalog would at least do spell check before publishing…Both of those errors are things Spell Check would have caught.

  • http://gravatar.com/anarchyinwa Will

    I hate art house wanky films, but I liked Take This Waltz. Margot was frustrating, but I know people like this, and can relate myself. I think people who have pretty decent lives and know all the right things to do often feel that sense of adventure lacking.

    I mean we all know we should date the guy who is loving and secure, but our hearts are often more stimulated by those sexy, risk-takers who are exciting – but let’s be honest – are pretty stupid at managing their own lives or a stable relationship. Margot was making this mistake.

    Made me feel so much happier that I’m not dating a “bad boy” douchebag, made me appreciate him more.

  • Carly Ganz

    SPOT ON! i couldn’t figure out why i felt so unenthused after watching. it all makes sense now. perfect review. seriously, get it together.

  • Stacie

    Manic Pixie Dream Girls and sad quirky indie chicks are so contrived. I want to see REAL female characters already!

  • charles

    i don’t know what movie you idiots saw but this movie is simple and does not require mush head gear. she is sexually suppressed. with unfulfilled expectations. the one scene told you what she was fantasizing.
    she was curios about having a threesome and curious about making it with a woman and two men. after fulfilling her fantasy she is still alone riding on a ride thinking about whatever. this movie stinks.

blog comments powered by Disqus