Poetry, Pt. 1: A Reduction Of Nantucket

Studies and practices in reductionist philosophy can bring a certain clarity and simplicity to an otherwise impenetrable cache of thought. Purely reducing names to semi-real/fake mathematical jargon can yield proper results. An instance: If a child, kid A (KA), had an affinity for activity one (A1), would he make a good way to ruin steak or a great 50-minute record? Only time could tell (Tct).

Let’s look at an example moderne. To preface it a bit for you folks who may not be as hip to limericks (hip-lims/ rick’s hips), this passage in an old favourite of my father. Not knowing all the words, I often heard the first line over and (you may have guessed) over. As I grew older, I researched this then unidentified poem of origin and character and gained some atypical insights.

There once was a man from Nantucket

Who kept all his cash in a bucket.

But his daughter, named Nan,

Ran away with a man

And as for the bucket, Nantucket.

-1902, internets

Many people write characters into storylines eager to drive a plot. Far too often these attempts produce sequences that become cumbersome and unavoidably plural. Did you see ‘Primer?’ Don’t get me wrong, that was a really good movie… but still. These storylines (lots of shit) are better defined in the term Plots. Let us see if a more-streamlined fashion can be (i.e. cutting out middlemen)…

There once was a from Nantucket

Kept all cash in a bucket.

But[,] named,

Ran away (with a)

And as for the bucket, Nantucket.

Getting there, right? Let us continue: dissolve locations and objects…

There once was

Kept all in a

But named

Ran away

[not applicable]

This is now starting to take shape. Once there was something that hoarded and named. Eventually he/ she/ it ran away — prime(r, sorry) example of a singular Plot. Perhaps this is a love poem. Well, maybe not a love poem as much as the poem-penner penning the pining of the persistent burden of lost love or a poncey love ode; either way it works. Now that the reduced base is set, additive ideas are free to flow.

[Stay with me here.]

Everyone enjoys snow, but not everyone embraces the cold that habitually accompanies it. So we simply alter the setting of the piece to a mildly warm and snow-filled day. As you may have guessed, il y a un nouveau problème, bien sûr: what to wear. Women enjoy wearing shorts and embrace the summer sun with a vigor never seen from the opposite sex. Men should not wear shorts. Only daft pillocks expose their scrawny pronounced kneed-limbs in public. Just wear pants, it’s really not too much to ask. So, in re(knee)cap, women can wear shorts and revel in warm snow — that’s all and well. Men should remain panted and may also join in.

Where did this bastard child of nature occur? Let’s say your hometown (Th). Give the people some names and you’re done.

Cheers,

L.S.L. Peck TC mark

image – Jinx!

Related

More From Thought Catalog

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1363230138 Michael Koh

    ….?

  • Guessed

    Huh? What the fuck are you even talking about?

  • Robert L.

    No offence, but I’m in a government-sponsored programme for talented writers and I still don’t f**king understand this article. WTF?

  • Anonymous

    http://www.lovetoshopping.org  Cheapest Vans Shoes,Tiffany Jewelry Company,Wholesale Hollister Clothing 

  • valtameri

    What are you on, bro?

  • http://www.nosexcity.com NoSexCity

    You almost lost me but now I’m in love.

  • guest.

    im going to read this everyday for a month and once i understand (which i will), i will comment once again to appreciate your complexity .

  • Anonymous

    Fuck you. 

    No seriously, fuck you. 

  • Guest

    Your[e, sorry] lack of coherence and use of brackets doesn’t make you an e [e] cummings.

  • Guest

    hmmm, probably. But lets presuppose that you couldn’t, then what?

blog comments powered by Disqus