Did Marrying Tom Cruise Hurt Katie Holmes’s Career?

Love and marriage can be tricky in Hollywood. Especially if you’re famous — or want to be — and you get hitched to someone who’s more famous than you are.

Remember when Jada Pinkett was one of the most promising young black actresses, thanks to roles in early career hits like Set It Off and The Nutty Professor? Then, in 1997, she became Jada Pinkett-Smith (after marrying Will Smith) and decided that being a wife and mother was more important than having a huge Hollywood career. It was an admirable move (though as Angelina Jolie seems to prove, it’s not impossible for women to have it all in Hollywood: family, fame and their own fortune), but I’ve always wondered how huge Pinkett’s career might have been had she not added the Smith — the name and the husband.

And what about the famous women — past and present — in Tom Cruise’s life? Nicole Kidman is a fine actress, one of the best, but would she have spent more years on the outskirts of stardom, like her best friend Naomi Watts, if she hadn’t become Mrs. Cruise in 1990? Becoming the second ex-Mrs. Cruise (after Mimi Rogers) in 2001 worked even more in favor of her career. She’s now an Oscar winner and one of the most sought-after actresses in Hollywood, despite having a relatively poor box-office track record.

As for Penelope Cruz, she was doing just fine before she began her three-year romantic entanglement with Cruise, and she’s been doing even better since they split, scoring three Academy Award nominations and one Oscar.

Then there’s Katie Holmes. Poor Katie Holmes. She gets so little respect these days. So much of her press coverage seems to focus on the fact that she’s the third Mrs. Cruise and mother of Suri (her too-adorable-for-words 4-year-old daughter with Tom), and she probably owes most of the attention she gets to her marital status. Now she might follow in the footsteps of Jennifer Aniston — whose marriage to Brad Pitt and their subsequent divorce may not have made her career, but it certainly bumped her up the Hollywood food chain — as Adam Sandler’s upcoming costar. Aniston and Sandler will portray colleagues pretending to be a couple in next February’s Just Go With It(costarring, incidentally, Nicole Kidman), and Holmes is reportedly in talks to join Sandler and Al Pacino in the comedy Jack and Jill.

Sandler would play another hapless sap whose twin sister (also played by Sandler) becomes the house guest from hell, Pacino would appear as himself, and Holmes would costar as the brother’s wife, despite not previously having shown any particular proficiency for comedy. (Neither did Patricia Arquette before Little Nicky, and look how poorly that Sandler film did.) Still, it would be a great gig if Holmes gets it, especially since I’m not convinced that marrying Cruise was such a good career move.

In some ways, in fact, I think it’s worked against her. Her marriage has overshadowed her career to the extent that people forget that there was a time, pre-Tom Cruise, when Holmes was a rising star in her own right. After Dawson’s Creek ended, she was just as likely to succeed as her costar Michelle Williams. In fact, Holmes worked with Oscar-winning director Ang Lee (in The Ice Storm) years before Williams did (in Brokeback Mountain). She also worked with acclaimed directors Curtis Hanson (in Wonder Boys), Sam Raimi (in The Gift), Christopher Nolan (in Batman Begins), Jason Reitman (in Thank You For Smoking) and headlined Pieces of April (which finally brought Patricia Clarkson an Oscar nomination) before she became best known as Cruise’s other half in 2005.

Since then, her work has been sporadic, in part, I imagine, for the same reason that Pinkett-Smith’s post-Will Smith filmography is slightly flimsy. I still can’t believe she turned down The Dark Knight to do Mad Money (speculation blames her husband’s objections to the love scenes in the Batman sequel), and her 2008 Broadway debut in a revival of Arthur Miller’s All My Sons, a great move on paper, earned mixed reviews. Portraying Jackie Kennedy next year in The Kennedys, the History Channel’s first scripted series, feels unnecessary — especially since her performance no doubt ultimately will be upstaged by Rachel Weisz’s in Darren Aronofsky’s upcoming Jackie O biopic — but maybe Jack and Jill and her upcoming role in Son of No One (with Channing Tatum, Ray Liotta and Juliette Binoche and, once again, Al Pacino), will be the first steps in saving her from being best known as Tom Cruise’s wife — and Suri’s mom.

And if not, there’s always life after Cruise. As Kidman and Cruz proved, it’s full of potential. TC mark

Image via


More From Thought Catalog

  • Madison Moore

    i think the real issue here is that nicole kidman is playing in a movie with ADAM SANDLER. i think katie's marriage to tom totally propped up her star. she was dawson's creek girl before she was married to cruise, and i think that most hollywood marriages are kind of like business deals. you know? after all, celebrities are brands like any other.

    • Jeremy Helligar

      But look at all the fine directors with whom Katie worked before she even met Cruise. She certainly became more famous once she got hitched to Tom, but I do believe it was at the expense of some of her critical respectability. Now the same people who used to praise Katie for being an excellent up and comer, now snicker at her. She gave up The Dark Knight to do Mad Money, and she's doing a History Channel series! Some of her upcoming projects look promising, but I wouldn't imagine that she was considered for any of them because of her marital status. I'd say it was IN SPITE OF her marital status. Tom Cruise is now basically considered a joke, and being married to him sort of makes you the punchline!

      As for Nicole and Adam Sandler, I was kind of surprised, too. But let's not forget that she did do Bewitched with Will Ferrell.

  • http://twitter.com/readdanwrite Daniel Roberts

    Who is Katie Holmes?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1628148658 Brenna Haddan

    Which was horrible.

blog comments powered by Disqus