Let’s Quit Using The F Word

One of the most frequent complaints of vocal feminists is that many people have the wrong idea about what feminism really is. In college, we all took the gender classes that reiterated the same thing: Feminists are not anti-male, sexist man-haters who believe in female superiority and dominance over men. Or rather, feminist ideology does not dictate that this is so. It’s all about equality — equal opportunity and equal respect. While common knowledge now, I remember that this news was a surprise to me. I’d always been a strong individual, a strong young person who never paid any heed to external limitations on my selfhood because of my femaleness. So why had I not known the truth about feminism? My mother was (and still is) a freight train of a woman, who, in retrospect, never treated me like a girl; in fact, I realize now that I was raised with very little gender-focus at all. She never indicated that I was any more or any less or different than each boy and girl I went to school with, and I can’t think of a single decision my mother made because of my sex. Equality was evidently a value my mother raised me with — consciously or not. Yet she had never mentioned feminism to me, and I was left to know feminism like a good portion of the country sees it still: falsely, negatively, and as an ideology less associated with equality than with womanhood.

So this is a problem. Feminists want to truly be known for what they stand for, and struggle every day to change (or rather, clarify) the perception of their community. The root of their problem is simple: the commonly-accepted meaning of feminism is something other than what it, by definition, is. Somewhere in the course of the word’s cultural history, it was robbed of its original purpose. The falsity may have been a result of sexist backlash to the movement, or of the media only presenting the most extreme individuals — the “man haters” we’ve come to characterize who claimed feminism as their own. Or it might have been derived from simple ignorance. But what matters is that it happened, and this must be acknowledged.

Words evolve for the better or worse. They are born and then they live in our mouths and then, often, they die. Resisting these life cycles is as futile as resisting our own. Tell as many people as you want that “impactful” isn’t a word; you can’t stop it from flooding our vernacular and becoming, in its recognition, exactly that: a word.

Feminism, it can be argued then, has developed another meaning. If I had gone through life without taking a feminism class and without reading several feminist publications on a daily basis, I would still be part of a large number who define it differently. You could counter my argument by saying that if I use a word incorrectly and never looked it up in a dictionary that I’d still be using it erroneously. But that’s only partially correct. Because if a large enough group uses that word incorrectly… give it a few years. You’ll see my “incorrect” definition underneath (or in place of) the original faster than you’d believe. In other words, meaning is influenced by usage, not just origin.

You could also argue that while words evolve, ideologies don’t. “Sexism means the same thing it’s always meant. So does capitalism.” Yes and no. “Republican,” for example, means something very different than it did twenty years ago — both from internal change and external opinion. We characterize things with terminology the best we can for the best we know at the time. “Negro” was once a commonplace, even neutral term that is now painfully, and offensively, outdated. “FtM” and “MtF” were used in the trans* community for years before our thoughts on gender expression became more evolved, and now these are terms largely considered incorrect within the community. I often come across feminists who write, “Feminism shouldn’t be a dirty word!” Well, why not? It was absolutely appropriate for its day and age, for the movement that needed to happen and for the women who made it happen. But now it’s outdated. And I’m not sure why we’re struggling so hard to keep it alive.

Why are we holding onto this one? The thing I love most about the incredible “feminist” women I read, listen to, and idolize is their constant need for progress, and their uncanny ability to influence it. The worst type of “feminism,” the kind that mostly exists on the internet, is the type that is constantly correcting, backtracking, and dwelling on has-beens and problems instead of discussing solutions, and ways to move forward. It’s as if this type of feminism is blind to the time we’re living in, the great equalizer that is our current technology, and the potential we hold in our hands to redefine women as individuals. Not just women. Not just “feminists.” But equal, unique members of society.

If you can’t tell, I love words. I love them like air. But I don’t love the word “feminist,” and I think it’s for the same reason others might be turned off by it. If you’re a sexist, you’re in favor of one sex over another. If you’re a Marxist, you’re in favor of Marxist ideology over other ideologies. If you’re a feminist, following this etymological trend, you’re in favor of the feminine over… the masculine? That’s the implication. “Masculism” is a bizarre, anti-feminist movement that I’ve only read about in the depths of Wikipedia, but pretend for a moment that it had the exact same tenets of feminism: Equality between the sexes. Would you call yourself a masculist? I’m not sure I would. Not because I don’t like men, not because I wouldn’t want to be associated with masculinity, but because it just feels so damn exclusive — even if it, at its core, was not. Words hold power, breed associations and stir sentiments, and we can’t ignore their effects on how we think about their meanings.

It’s a matter of branding. It saddens me to admit that branding matters at all; I’m a firm believer that content should always outweigh the presentation of content, and would like to subsequently say that the tenets of a movement carry more weight than how society perceives it. But I can’t tell you that branding isn’t important, because it really, really is. If you want more people to join you, to adopt your ideology, it starts with the image, and the nomenclature. There’s no denying that “feminism” was once an effective, powerful word. It brought women together like never before, creating a type of solidarity that would go on to achieve suffrage, lead to Roe v. Wade, and make our voices heard. We should both cherish this and admit that, as a brand, “feminism” is no longer a rallying-point, but an echo of a previous era we’ve evolved from.

We do not have equality in our society between the sexes. I don’t need to list the disparities — most of you know them, have experienced them, or have witnessed them. “A long way to go” is an understatement of a cliché, especially in a political climate that has taken a baseball bat to the knees of women’s healthcare. What we need to do now is rally again, like the extraordinary women before us. And this time, we need to unite under the notion of individuality. Because the greatest thing about women today is our differences — that we’re becoming less frequently lumped together as “the women.” Men have long held the privilege of singularity, and we can work toward equality by claiming our own individual voices. And the first step is to trade “feminism” in for something more era-appropriate, and inclusive.

I personally suggest, like many have before me, “equalism.” It’s a word that’s been discussed, defined, but never full-heartedly claimed. Some individuals who might be “feminists” by its original definition have embraced the term. Some sexist, anti-feminist groups have also staked claim. Another definition centers on equality regardless of any difference — race, sex, gender, or otherwise. It’s a word in flux — on the verge of evolving into something greater than what it currently is. I say we grab it. I say we make it our own, and admit that progress often occurs by focusing on the things we can control, and forfeiting those we can’t. We can’t force people to like the term “feminism,” implant in their brains the “true,” “untainted” definition. We can, however, put our notions of equality front-and-center under a more inclusive, evolved “brand.” And most importantly, we can be adaptable in the presentation of our ideals, because they’re worth more than anything else — and certainly worth dropping a name that is inhibiting our progress. TC mark

image – Kevin Dooley


More From Thought Catalog

  • Markhamf

    I’m really glad this was about “feminism” not “fuck”. Really.

    • Nishant

      I was going to say just that. I had a “get over yourself” comment armed and ready to be fired.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000127422406 Kat Lawson

        I saw the title and my thoughts were 1. Fuck? 2. Faggot. 3. Feminist? 

        But I was almost sure it’d be number 2. CURVEBALL

  • Guest

    fuck off.

    • http://www.facebook.com/ninjatek Chris Leher

      Somebody replied without reading the article and just the title.

  • http://trevande.tumblr.com Stephanie Laskowski

    One time I overheard a pressed white dude say we should use the term “equalist” instead of feminist. HAH.

  • Anonymous

    I’m really out of it today. It took me three or four paragraphs to realize which F-word you were talking about. Ugh!

    Great article, though.

  • Jon


  • amon's masked henchman

    I am an Equalist.


    • Helene

      I was thinking that the whole time.

    • Guestropod


  • bee

    I really love you for this.  Thank you. 
    I love calling myself a feminist, because of all the other feminists who are doing such amazing advocacy work.  It makes me feel empowered, strong, and connected to my beliefs.  And yet I get intimidated to tell people I’m a feminist, because it’s always “then how come you have a boyfriend?  why do you wear dresses and heels? you don’t LOOK like a feminist!  just make sure you’re not a femi-nazi!”  These sentiments coming from both men and women.  It’s just so hard to explain what feminism currently is without all of the negative, preconceived notions.  Feminists combat issues of race, sexual orientation, class issues, and so much more.  Not just “women issues.”  – though there is obviously a focus on gender rights. 
    So yes, even though I love being a feminist, I would GLADLY take on the title of ‘equalist’.  Because that’s what it’s all about.  Not one gender being better than another, but all genders being equal. 
    Really.  Thank you again.  You’ve given me hope for TC.

  • http://twitter.com/#!/juwug JWG

    I can understand why people get turned off by the word “feminist” when they assume it means the feminine over the masculine, but whenever I hear the word “equalist” I just cringe.

  • Strife Tech


  • http://www.facebook.com/jessicaxiaomorris Jessica Morris

    I appreciate this article and I think it’s very relevant to current politics however, language is crucial to understanding of the women’s movement’s past struggles and what needs to be solved today. Omitting such a powerful word, though with its stigma, would trivialize the activists whom have given voice to those without one. The language given under feminism, when utilized well, can effectively promote change to the gender disparity. 

    • CMP


  • Dan

    Why not use the term “egalitarian”?

    We don’t need to invent a new movement or a new word for ourselves. Just throw your weight behind the bandwagon that’s always been pulling for equality between all humans.

  • CMP

    I second Jessica: Abandoning the term ‘feminism’ belittles the activists and feminists who came before, while perpetuating a fear of feminisms and feminists.

  • Paige

    We should not abandon “feminism.” You don’t need to change a word because a few (or a bunch) of people are put off by it. It is not too difficult to simply learn what a word means.  “Equalism” will, obviously, argue for equality, but will it show why men and women are not treated equally like feminism does? Feminism tries to dissect the reasons why women and men are perceived as different. It tackles problems at their roots. Whether you are a white or black or brown woman you are still a woman. Feminism is in its third wave and is trying to be more inclusive to those who are not white or straight or cis, etc.
    Also, the reason why I wouldn’t want to call myself a “macsulist” is because it implies that men are oppressed and need to be elevated to the level of women, which is false. When we are as equal as men, then I might embrace “equalism,” but until then I will be a feminist. 

  • Brandon h

    I personally welcome our new female overlords.

    I kid I kid! TL;DR

  • Michaelwg

    So “impactful”

  • Phbmay


  • Waicool

     i trust you will flush after you are done having your feminist movement

  • Feminist

    First, let me say that this is the best-constructed argument I’ve read against using the label “feminist.” That being said, I’m still not convinced.

    The reason there’s so much stigma behind “feminist” is because of the people who really don’t want women’s equality. I’ve read so many comments describing some negative feature of women “and even worse, feminists.” The reason feminists are “worse than” women is instead of merely existing, they demand equality. Any word that describes a movement for equality will be stigmatized by a society that’s trying to resist that movement.Language is a complicated system, and even more so when you actively try to shape it. We’ve had our successes, though. “Queer” went from being one of many slurs to an acceptable blanket term that actually helped us move away from specific labels. Now feminists are trying reclaim “slut,” with some success. When I see it in “sluts vote” posters, for instance, it really is powerfully recontextualized. But how can we reclaim other words if we refuse to reclaim our own label?

    While I respect those who choose another name for their belief in gender equality, I believe the most effective way to deal with the stigma surrounding “feminist” is to actively use the label while showing that my beliefs are rational and that the stereotypes don’t define me.

blog comments powered by Disqus