The Ebbs And Flows Of PlayStation Design

I remember, at the time of the original PlayStation’s release (1994),¬†attempting to weigh up the strengths and weaknesses of all of the¬†machines that were coming to market in what uses to be called the¬†hardware cycle. Alongside Sony‚Äôs machine other contenders included Philips‚Äô CD-i and the 3DO, in¬†addition to entries from manufacturers more firmly established in the games business: Nintendo’s N64 (still a few years away and known at the time by a series of enigmatic codenames), and Sega’s Saturn.

Of those named above only the N64 retained the use of cartridges as¬†storage for its games; all of the other machines represented gaming’s¬†first steps into optical disc media – a choice which impacted the design of¬†the machines in some interesting ways.

Looking back now, from the age of pocket-sized HD touch screens, the¬†original PlayStation’s flimsy flip-top lid seems cheap and inelegant.¬†At the time the very prospect of popping its little catch to insert¬†one of the system’s black CD-ROMs was an almost tactile thrill from the¬†first time you saw the machine pictured in a magazine. The design of the system¬†was built entirely around the disc-housing at its centre. Fairly¬†basic, not showy, and a terrible shade of dishwater grey inherited¬†from Nintendo’s SNES, the unit was nevertheless desirable and the¬†object of much attention right from its inception. Despite its rather boxy design, Sony had created a machine, the brand¬†design of which was to become almost synonymous with videogames, until¬†the arrival of Nintendo’s Wii in 2006 supplanted it in the mainstream¬†consciousness.

I haven’t been a fan of some of Sony’s design choices with¬†PlayStation. The first machine seemed utilitarian and charmless, but¬†was improved greatly with a redesign in 2000 that reduced its size¬†and rounded out its edges. Similarly the original PS2, whilst highly¬†desirable and impressive at launch in terms of its processing power and capabilities,¬†looked like a slab of concrete, or an eyesore of a skyscraper from¬†which one may have fallen. Again a slim version four years later made for a much better looking machine. For the XBox 360, Microsoft employed San Francisco‚Äôs Astro Studios, who worked in collaboration with the Hers Experimental Design Laboratory (Osaka, Japan) to prove¬†it was possible to make an elegantly designed system with a relatively large form factor (necessitated by¬†the need for powerful processors and the fans required to cool them).¬†Sony, again, fared less well: the PlayStation 3, whilst less industrial-looking than its predecessor in terms of design, adopted a gloss finish which made it a magnet for dust, and was hurt by a questionable decision regarding the typeface for its logo. For a third machine in a row it took the advent of the slim model in 2010 to correct some of these missteps.

One element of the PlayStation brand which has remained constant, and which is undeniably amongst the most iconic pieces of brand design in the last 20 years is the controller, and in particular the four symbols which grace its face buttons. Whilst Nintendo has changed its joypads a lot between hardware (making a revolutionary controller the centrepiece of their latest machine), the PlayStation 3’s controller bears a striking resemblance to the original PlayStation’s. The joypad’s lead designer, Teiyu Goto, recently gave an interview to Famitsu magazine in which he discussed the process of designing the system and its controller. Particularly interesting are his comments on why he chose to forgo the normal lettering of face buttons in favor of symbols:

I gave each symbol a meaning and a color. The triangle refers to¬†viewpoint; I had it represent one’s head or direction and made it¬†green. Square refers to a piece of paper; I had it represent menus or¬†documents and made it pink. The circle and X represent ‘yes’ or ‘no’¬†decision-making and I made them red and blue respectively. People thought those colors were mixed up, and I had to reinforce to¬†management that that’s what I wanted.

Those four symbols have become powerfully intertwined with the idea of videogames in a way which lettered buttons never could. It was a stroke of genius on Goto’s part to implement them, and they have understandably become the central aspect of the PlayStation brand. Perhaps with PlayStation 4 Sony will design a machine that matches their simplicity and elegance. TC mark

You should become a fan of Thought Catalog on facebook here.


More From Thought Catalog

  • a polar bear

    typo in first paragraph
    i liked this article, i have been playing playstation/2/3 my entire life, remember the first time i got a 'dualshock' controller in about 97 (seems right) or 98. i made my brother play with the controller without analogue sticks until we got our ps2 on release. it was my favourite time, i felt older and wiser because of it.
    nintendo's controllers, especially in my mind the 'm' controller for the 64, always took me some time to adjust to. the ps1/2/3 controllers haven't changed much (the addition of the vibration, the ps3's menu button) and it just seems like the other two systems are trying to recreate something that simple and effective (the wiimote comes close for simplicity, the smaller xbox controller comes close for effectiveness), but i think even for a non-gamer the ps1/2/3 controllers are just basic, probably as basic as any controller since the nintendo entertainment system.
    i don't know
    i liked this article

  • Michael Kramer

    that was a lot more interesting than i expected.

blog comments powered by Disqus