Love Letter From A Polyamorist

Jul. 25, 2012
Kit Bryant lives in Iowa City with her valid alibi and several innocuous non-lethal pastimes. Outside the workplace, ...
Despite the loosening of sexual restrictions in recent decades, open relationships and cheating remain highly stigmatized. However, focusing on the problem of cheating distracts us from focusing on the problem of monogamy…When every cell in [one’s] body is craving sex with someone else, monogamy begins to feel like sexual incarceration.
-Eric Anderson, Ph.D., via Huffington Post

My Darling Jill,

You are not my everything. You are, rather, my night sky; your Dalmatian-like freckles form the constellations, each like a delicate flower on a sprig of baby’s-breath. And, like baby’s-breath, you are best in a bouquet full of other lovely young buds: perhaps some shapelier, some more fragrant, some more Chinese. Perhaps it was not even you, but rather Samantha with all the freckles. Regardless, your kiss is like none other (though quite similar in moisture and technique to Monica’s), and I thrill at your touch. You mean so much to me, but again, just to reiterate, you do not mean everything to me. Not even close.

I will never forget our first date. In the park, we held hands by the water’s edge and laughed at the dogs that dropped the Frisbees. Then, as the sunlight dappled your warm skin, you looked at me with your luminous, smiling eyes and said…actually, come to think of it, that wasn’t you. That was Sha’Quanda. Well, I’m sure our first date was just as magical, just as I’m sure I could go back and correct this paragraph, inserting memories from a date you were actually on, but I have so very many of these letters to write, you see? You are so… special that I know you will understand. Yes, you are so… I want to say, allergic to shellfish? Oh, Jill. The times we’ve had.

Because of all the many unforgettable memories we’ve shared, it pains me to think that you would even consider broaching the subject of such a disgusting, unnatural act: dating exclusively. You wish to hoard my love for yourself, to withhold from me things and activities which bring me joy, like that tie Kelsey bought me, and also a cornucopia of varied sexual experience with multiple partners. This is far crueler than any perceived slight I’ve caused you. Could you ask the friendly utopian society of bonobos, our close genetic relatives, to stop indiscriminately copulating, or to stop hurling their own feces? No; to do so would be asking them to forgo their basest animal instincts. Why, then, would you ask the same of me? I am a man, yes, but I am also an animal. You cannot conscionably ask me to stop acting like the animal I am.

I mean, do I “love” you? Well, of course! I love you like I love red M&Ms, or experimental jazz. But, no man could possibly want to eat only red M&Ms as their sole source of nutrition; that’s a death sentence. It’s not even the best M&M. And, who in their right mind would listen to nothing but experimental jazz ad nauseum? Eventually it just begins to sound like nonsense. “Boop boop squee BLAT, let’s talk about where this is going, why don’t you want to meet my parents, deedly-doo bop.” Come on, Jill. That’s madness! Devoting yourself to one pleasure with your whole being means depriving yourself of hundreds of briefer, easier pleasures. So, yes, Jill, I do know the “meaning of the word ‘love’.” If this weren’t a love letter, I wouldn’t have opened with a quote.

Do not fear to bathe in the strange waters of my love, Jill. Perhaps, after a time, you will set adrift your antiquated views regarding “fidelity,” loosen your panties from their wad, and not find my scatter-shot brand of love so peculiar after all. The truth is, Jill, I am not the “commitment-phobe” you claim me to be. I could envision pledging myself entirely to several of you, if the right combination of women came along. If you play your cards right, you could be one of my wives someday. However, that can never happen if you continue to lash out against me with your closed-minded bigotry. If you cannot accept me for who I am, then I am sorry for you, sorry for the love and future you are forfeiting, and…I just remembered: it’s Jane, isn’t it? Not Jill. Oh, Jane. I could live without you, but please don’t make me.

Love, Dick TC mark

You should follow Thought Catalog on Twitter here.


Cataloged in

Text Size:

A | A | A

  • Curious

    Beautifully written.

  • laura

    vaild point made in your letter: red m&m’s aren’t the best kind; blue ones are

    • anon

      i thought i was the only one who noticed

  • http://www.facebook.com/donald.elder Donald Elder

    “Yes, you are so… I want to say, allergic to shellfish? ”

    That was a good line. Otherwise I found this piece disappointingly narrow-minded and monotone. It’s not exactly inspiring to pick on an already highly marginalized topic. It’s actually just kind of lazy.

    • DT

      @donald totally agree with you about both the funniness of that one line and the inaneness/lack of direction of this piece

    • Alex

      Oh shut up. It’s funny. And well-written. Get the stick out from up your ass and go on a date with Jill. Sounds like you need it.

  • Kate

    I love this.

  • JK

    Ugh it’s true, polyamorists aren’t just content with being polyamorous (which I, and many others have no problem with) it’s the way they try to justify polyamory by belittling any other type of relationship, especially monogamous ones. When they should be saying “you know what? I don’t NEED to justify myself, I’m happy!”. Good article!

    • http://www.facebook.com/donald.elder Donald Elder

      Polyamorous people belittle monogamous relationship. Monogamous people belittle polyamorous relationships. This cycle is played out and needs to be broken. An article like this is just another act of war, practically baiting for a satirical response, “Love Letter from a Monogamist,” in which the writer promises the recipient the world, admits he has promised it to every woman he’s dated in the past, but assures her that this time it’s really forever.

      • JK

        Of course there’ll be an opposing article, I’m sure TC already has it ready to publish. They love a good argument, gets them more page views. The letter from a monogamist will get even more stick than this one.

    • http://gravatar.com/gaijinrei Rei

      I’m aware that people who belittle monogamy in an attempt to justify their inclination towards polyamory exist. They annoy me and most other polyamorous people too. In fairness to them, though, it is natural to want to justify your lifestyle to someone when it feels like it constantly comes under attack. Does that make them less annoying? No. But then the fact that you’ve clearly heard some polyamorous people belittling monogamy before doesn’t make your self-righteous blanket statements any less annoying, either.

      This article was quite well-written and had some decent one-liners. Pity about its treatment of the subject matter.

      • JK

        How was my statement self righteous? I didn’t once say polyamory is wrong, nor did I say monogamy is the only way to do things. (Not even getting into other types of relationship). In fact, I was pointing out that it’s a shame that polyamorists feel that they have to justify their way of life to anyone at all.

  • Matt Good

    ad nauseam, not nauseum. also you sound like a douche. nice try being funny tho

  • Buck

    Very sharp and funny. Her blog is great, too.

  • Mark

    Very clever and witty! I enjoyed it very much.

  • http://chopsticklady.wordpress.com fringster

    Is this based on your real life experiences? Just curious.

    • http://popslashcorn.wordpress.com Kit Bryant

      Hi! The idea stemmed from talking to guys like the one who wrote this article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-anderson-phd/cheating_b_1528890.html

      I think it’s funny and sad that there are people like this out there who are “experts” on human relations, biologically speaking, who can entirely miss the poetry and depth of love.

      Everyone has to choose what style of relationship(s) is right for them, but it’s silly to use science as an excuse to belittle us poor, naive romantics who give and expect complete devotion.

  • molly

    lame article, I think it was lazy too. picking on polyamory, something new and different.

  • Owlett

    I can’t tell if this was supposed to be a joke, or if you really did just sound that horrible. If you were aiming for irony, good job. Otherwise I found your reasoning to be remarkably flimsy and shockingly shallow.

  • A Red M&M

    I’m personally an M&M, and the fact that you marginalised M&Ms BASED ON THEIR COLOUR disgusts me, It’s articles like this that allow segregated holiday M&M bags to exist. M&Ms already have a hard enough time you douche! I am what I am, I don’t have to justify my crispy coating and chocolate centre to you!

  • M

    This isn’t how every polyamorous relationship works. Yes, you have multiple partners, but the basis of your relationships is communication, honesty, and — dare I say it? — commitment. Devotion to your partners is just as important in polyamorous relationships as it is in monogamous ones.

    I came to this article hoping for something openminded and closer to the truth. I was disappointed.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recently Cataloged