Love Is A Battlefield

Jun. 26, 2012
Donna Peterson is a 26-year-old writer, director, and actress from Silver Spring, Maryland, who received her B.A. in ...

If there is one profound falsehood that the movies have taught us, it’s that love is easy. Sure, there is the standard screwball boy-meets-girl, boy-loses-girl, boy-gets-girl-back sequence of complications endemic to the musical comedy genre, but as a rule, some enchanted evening, you looked up when he came through the door, and though you’ve never been in love before, you got lost in his arms and you had to stay, because it only takes a moment to be loved a whole life long (there’s a chance I may be mixing my musical metaphors here just a smidge. You are an inveterate theater geek if you managed to pick out the five different shows I just referenced).

The point is, it’s time you jettisoned that sweet old canard that the whole world will light up in some sort of ecstasy-induced phosphorescence when you meet that one special person you’re destined to spend your life with, because it doesn’t work that way. Why? Because… brace yourself:

There is no such thing as the perfect person.

Let me say it again, because I think it bears repeating.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE PERFECT PERSON.

In the words of Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting, “You’re not perfect, sport, and let me save you the suspense: this girl you’ve met, she’s not perfect either. But the question is whether or not you’re perfect for each other. That’s the whole deal. That’s what intimacy is all about.” Intimacy isn’t easy, it isn’t immediately gratifying, and most of the time it’s a bit squidgy around the edges. Moreover, intimacy is — call me a cynic — something that, given enough time, love, and effort, you can cultivate with just about anyone. If that makes your warm fuzzy romantic pink-loofah of an aortic pump shrivel, I’m sorry. But it’s the truth. Love isn’t a feeling, a fantasy, or a cosmic mandate; it’s a personal choice. It’s a personal choice you get up and make every single damn day, and some days are harder than others.

There isn’t one magical, mystical, foreordained person out there for everyone, and anyone who tells you otherwise has been freebasing the fairy-tale crack for too long. The decision — ultimately — is all yours. It’s up to you to look at a universe full of nice people, all of them (well, at least half of them, depending on your sexual preference) prospective mates, and determine, with a steady head and heart, with carefully weighed subjectivity and objectivitythat all other things being equal, this is the person most likely to make you happy for the rest of your earthly existence. I had a professor once who, upon marrying his wife, was asked by a friend, “Why are you marrying her?” When he gave his truthful answer — “Because she makes me happy” — he was accused of being a Kantian, a self-interested user espousing a dangerous and destructive philosophy. This is, of course, patently ridiculous. I can think of no better reason to marry someone than because (s)he makes you happy. If the simple act of watching TV, of cooking dinner, of fighting over taking out the garbage, is sanctified and transmogrified (thank you, Calvin and Hobbes, for destroying that word forever) by being with this person — on the monstrously sophistical grounds that you just can’t imagine wanting to watch TV or cook dinner or fight over taking out the garbage with anybody else – then you’ve made a good choice.

It doesn’t mean you’ll never struggle once you make that choice. The complexities of being in — and staying in — love make an M.C. Escher print look straightforward by comparison. Love is not a magical fix-all: you will still carry your own woes and pain, as will the other. “We both knew this,” writes C. S. Lewis, “I had my miseries, not hers; she had hers, not mine… We were setting out on different roads. This cold truth, this terrible traffic regulation… is just the beginning of the separation.” No matter how much you love each otheryou can only bear one another’s burdens to a certain point. After that, you will still carry around enough personal baggage to ground a Boeing 747: the baggage of former loves and former losses, of former attachments and heartaches and emotional entanglements. When you make one life choice, you de facto preclude every other life choice. As a dear friend once told me, “We always have our options open — until we find the one option too good to pass up.” And once you find the option too good to pass up? You seize it. But it is perfectly reasonable for this to be difficult. If you’re signing on board for a lifelong journey through the stormy seas of “for better” and “for worse” and you haven’t lain awake at night agonizing over the decision at least once or twice, you probably haven’t thought it through enough. “The first two facts which a healthy boy or girl feels about sex are these,” writes Chesterton, “first that it is beautiful and then that it is dangerous.”  If you’re even considering marriage without a healthy regard for this twin-pronged principle, you’re a colossal idiot.

At the end of the day, you choose the person you want to make a life with and you, a la Nike, just do it — but with the awareness that love is messy and it only gets messier with each passing year.  It’s not like it looks in the movies — it is hard, and it is real – and that’s exactly how it’s supposed to be. TC Mark

You should follow Thought Catalog on Twitter here.

image – Shutterstock

Cataloged in

Text Size:

A | A | A

  • H

     ”Moreover, intimacy is — call me a cynic — something that, given enough time, love, and effort, you can cultivate with just about anyone.”

    THANK YOU!!! I’ve been saying this for years and no-one believes me!

  • http://www.itmakesmestronger.com/2012/06/love-is-a-battlefield-2/ Only L<3Ve @ ItMakesMeStronger.com

    [...] Thought Catalog » Love & Sex Add a comment [...]

  • K

    LOVE this. Thank you.

    Any chance you listen to Dan Savage? Your thoughts here very much remind me of his take on love and commitment.

  • Christoph

    I agree with this! And I think its very important for hopeless romantics to understand that when they say they found the “perfect” person that out of 7 billion people the person they found was in a homogeneous area that made it work for them at the time.

  • Joe

    I hope that the woman who just dumped me (a man who genuinely made her happy) for another man who “gives her butterflies” will read and understand this article.

  • http://nycroundtwo.wordpress.com wtrmlln

    Reblogged this on nyc round 2 and commented:
    So I know there is much hate for this site I read. I hate it plenty too. But sometimes an author writes something good like this. And I need to re-post it. And I wonder how much bullshit people think it is, or if it’s only bullshit because the article’s topic is obvious and who the fuck doesn’t think that. But then I realize that I don’t care, cause I thought all this shit before, still do and if you didn’t then have a peak into my brain through the words of someone else.

  • http://spacestruck.wordpress.com spacestruck

    Reblogged this on spacestruck and commented:
    I really needed this. To ponder over the meaning of love and relationships again.

  • Manulo

    Very good. Butterflies aren’t love.

    • andrew

      But they feel damn good don’t they.

      To the author and everyone else get Art of Loving by Eric Fromm.

      • Vanityvice

        Butterflies feel good but they are not there to stay. After they leave, it becomes a conscious effort to stay in love, I am in an 8-year relationship and it’s a choice I make everyday. And besides, we can’t always be chasing for butterflies… Eventually we get tired of them leaving.

  • js11871

    Too many people up in here ain’t been in love :’(

  • Mel

    I love this. My parents got married at 18 and 28 shortly after meeting – in my Mother’s eyes my Dad was simply her prince charming, her ‘everything’ – 38 years later they are still madly in love. Already in my late 20′s and not married, I asked my Dad why, after all the lovely women he dated did he choose my Mom and he said that he wanted to make the choice to love her forever. He said rather frankly that many of the other women probably would have made him very happy, and they could have built a life together. He said most decisions in life are like that – you look at your options, and many of them could work out great – but you make a decision, and then you fight every single day for it and don’t look back. I’m learning.

  • Marie

    I’m the furthest thing from a fairy-tale addict or believer, but I do believe everyone has a soul mate. There is one person intended for every one of us who marries. But finding that person and marrying him or her isn’t a guarantee of happiness. God doesn’t necessarily want us to be happy, but wants our souls to be saved. The perfidies of our fallen human natures may lead us to difficult spouses and marriages. But the difficulties peculiar to living with that particular spouse may be exactly what a soul needs to purify itself from the same perfidies that led it to that “wrong spouse.”

    Ultimately, though, one shouldn’t marry any person for the sake of being happy with them, because that happiness can’t and doesn’t last. Life is hard. And, marrying a person whom you don’t respect for the sake of their goodness and virtue makes life harder. My parents loved each other with fierce respect and devotion. They never, ever quarreled. Not once. Ever. They weren’t shallow or repressed; they were both incredibly virtuous people who loved and deeply respected one another for the sake of the other’s virtue. No one is perfect, but some folks really are more virtuous than others. I wish I had thought longer and harder on that before I married. And, I wish I had worked more on my own virtue to be worthy of the spouse who would have made life and love easier.

    • Blackbird

      I agree with almost everything you said, except for “everyone has a soul mate” and “one shouldn’t marry a person for the sake of being happy”. You see, I find it hard that there is only one person, out there, in this goddamn planet who is the “right one” for you.

      There’s 7 billion people on this planet, and 1 out of 7billion isn’t really a good statistic, it’s almost as bad as your chances of winning the lottery.

      I think relationships rely more on (1) personal choice (it takes two to tango, if one quits, it’s called a solo, or jacking off – whatever you want to call it), (2) current situation (if you’re in love with someone, and one of you has to end up in the Antartic, and one has to be living in the city surround by hot, gorgeous women, more or less, that relationship of yours is doomed to fail.

      Second, “one shouldn’t marry a person for the sake of being happy” – this is fine by me. Happiness is such a vague word we use, like many other feelings (such as love). Happiness differs from person to person. For some, it is as simple as that feeling after holding your pee after five hours in the car while you drive along a waterfall. For some, it’s as complicated as a full checklist of achievements that must be completed at a given time for that person to be happy. And for some, it can go deep as your best friend getting married, your son/daughter graduating with honors in college or you’ve achieved a certain amount of wisdom and knowledge you’ve been working so hard for a number of years.

      But whatever that happiness is, it is right 80% of the time, so long as it does not run over the basic human rights involved in this relationship. As long as its not the selfish kind of happy nor the immature, stupid kind of happy – remember that butterflies in your stomach feeling? (Those butterflies, will turn into crap you want to excrete). The type of happiness you are experiencing is hard to discern at the moment. Which is why divorce rate in the goddamn USA has skyrocketed, people here are lost in their definition of “happiness” and “freedom”.

      Therefore, marrying someone, out of happiness, so long as it’s the right kind, is acceptable. But one should remember, it’s not all about YOU, its about the both of you. It takes two dance.

      Btw, finding “the right one” is such a Western term. Remember, some religions allow people to have 2 or more spouses.

      • JK

        1 in 7 billion is actually a lot WORSE than your chances of winning the lottery. And also, some religions allow MEN to have more than one spouse, not “people”. So that approach is mostly power/control/money bullshit.

  • Shatha_A

    That was great

  • http://lakwonda.wordpress.com/2012/06/29/love-is-a-battlefield-donna-shute/ “Love Is A Battlefield” – Donna Shute | Lisa is trying to get to Dictionopolis

    [...] Read this. [...]

  • H

    I find it depressing how much this piece resonates with me. It’s truly what I believe, but I guess I’ve just always yearned for more. Oh well. Since we already believe that intimacy can be built up with anyone, if we somehow do manage to find the “perfect” one that just clicks in terms of everything, it’ll be a nice surprise, right?

  • http://oriana0214.wordpress.com Oriana P

    Reblogged this on Oriana K. Pawlyk.

  • Thought Catalog

    Reblogged this on Mikaela Ayeera's and commented:
    “it is hard, and it is real – and that’s exactly how it’s supposed to be.”

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recently Cataloged