In Terrifying Color: Vietnamese Buddhist Monk’s 1963 Self-Immolation

In June of 1963, Vietnamese Mahayana Buddhist monk Thích Quảng Đức burned himself to death at a busy intersection in Saigon. The self-immolation was done in response to the persecution of Buddhists by South Vietnam’s Ngo Dinh Diem administration. The Catholic regime had cracked down on practicing Buddhists by banning the flying of the traditional Buddhist flag; prohibiting Buddhists from exercising the same religious freedoms as Catholics; and the continued detainment of Buddhist monks and nuns  — a moment referred to as The Buddhist Crisis. Journalist/photographer Malcolm Browne captured the scene in Saigon for the Associated Press, and the stark black and white image quickly became an iconic visual of the turbulent 1960s.

Yesterday, a colorized version of the photograph was posted on Reddit.com. To see this image in color imbues a new level of terror and awe (view full-size image). In the original black and white image, this lone Buddhist monk appeared otherworldly, a ghost from the past familiar to us only from repetitious use in coffee table books, historical slide shows, and even album covers (see: Rage Against the Machine’s self-titled debut). But now, rendered in color, Thích Quảng Đức’s immolation has a whole new gravity. We get a better understanding of what bystanders saw. And the scene, for whatever reason, feels more present in color. Reports from that day often reference Thích Quảng Đức’s unflinching demeanor, how he never uttered a word or showed traces of pain or suffering, just perfect calm as his body was consumed by flames and he eventually collapsed. The video footage included below, a purported dramatization of the event from a 1963 Italian documentary (source), helps give context to this moment:

In recounting his coverage of the event for PBS’s “Reporting America at War” series, Malcolm Browne discusses what it was like to be in that moment:

It was clearly theater staged by the Buddhists to achieve a certain political end. At the same time, there was a human element to it that was just horrifying, because the sequence of pictures showed the initial shock of the flames touching his face, and so forth. He never cried out or screamed, but you could see from his expression that he was exposed to intense agony, and that he was dying on the spot — and then, in the end, when the body was rigidly burned, they couldn’t stuff him into a casket because he was splayed out in all directions. As shock photography goes, it was hard to beat. It’s not something that I’m particularly proud of. If one wants to be gruesome about it, it was a very easy sequence of pictures to take. Work is a great panacea for the horrors of that sort of situation, or of a battle, for that matter. I think combat photographers are very conscious of the idea that the real fear comes later, after they get home and develop their film and have a look at what they were through. Then they are aware that they nearly died. TC mark

You should follow Thought Catalog on Twitter here.

Cataloged in

Text Size:

A | A | A

  • http://kumquatparadise.tumblr.com aaron nicholas

    speechless

  • http://twitter.com/annemjw annemjw

    It should be noted (as it is inthe reddit thread) that that footage is from a reconstruction, and is not of the event itself. It is no less confronting for being so, but context is important.

  • champ

    jesus fucking christ

  • kelly huckaby

    i can't stop looking at it..

  • http://twitter.com/azigra Azi Graybar

    What the hell is wrong with all those people who could stand there and watch that. I don't care what it was about, it's sick.

  • Larry

    They are buddhists.

  • http://twitter.com/azigra Azi Graybar

    They're human.

  • http://twitter.com/rislynsey christopher lynsey

    The color

  • eric

    What the hell is wrong with you.

  • kelsey

    there is nothing WRONG with them, the man wanted to do it. what were they supposed to do?

  • Crazy Carrie Jakie

    They suppress their humanity. they are Buddhists

  • Girrawks65

    this is ridiculous. the acts that this monk is portraying are clearly not beneficial to human well being. it doesn't matter for what reason he was doing it. if buddhist monks removed the eyes of every third subscriber to their religion, that would be considered wrong, am I correct. these kinds of acts and your kind of response are the things holding the world back from pure morality.

  • eric

    what's going on… in this comment…

  • http://twitter.com/azigra Azi Graybar

    oh, and I guess that's a good thing?

  • Rawr

    pure morality? morality is what is holding the world back from progress…

  • AndreaDanielle

    the act that he died for what he believed in because he was in protest against governmental anti-Buddhist policies was ridiculous ? i dont know about you but the fact that he was willing to give up his life to show his full dedication toward his religion and to bring awareness in the most powerful way is NOT ridiculous.

    they didnt stop him, that would be complete disrespect towards him and the message he was trying to for fill. they're Buddhist and i believe he attained enlightenment

  • Dgdgdg

    fail

  • Anonymous

    I’ll tell you what’s wrong with them. NOTHING!!

  • Anonymous

    that the point.

  • Dbrown414564

    If you do not except Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior you go to hell for eternity. He did not attain enlightenment.

  • Justin

    No one is right and no one is wrong. No one can prove Christianity to be true or false. In the end, it doesn’t matter. He did it for the cause he believed in, and what we need to do is respect him for his action. We are all right in what we believe in, whether it be Buddism, Christianity, or Muslim. What we need is to learn to tolerate. However there is no question on his enlightenment. He achieved enlightenment and that photo proves it. Can you stay calm while you are burning to death? Can you set yourself on fire for the cause you believe in? Can you prove your religion better than others? I presume that your answers will be NOs. 

  • Justin

    How ignorant…

Recently Cataloged

  • Stop Delaying That Big Trip. Stop It.

    And while when you’re boarding the plane with no return ticket and no clear idea of how you’re going to suddenly construct an entirely new life for yourself, things can be incredibly intimidating, no drug on the planet could possibly replace the thrill. It’s wonderful.
    Chelsea is a writer living in Paris.
  • Video Killed The Radio Star, But The Internet Killed Pretty Much Everything Else

    Don’t get me wrong, I have always been a dynamic personality who could interact with and befriend the dead — but in 2011, having 1200 Facebook friends enables me to give just a perfunctory nod to each of them on a semi-regular basis without having to sustain any meaningful adult relationships.
  • Where I Grew Up

    I grew up in a dorm basement, earlier than the typical narrative demands. At a middle school dance, decked out in glasses and pleated pants, I ducked and weaved among the rest of the nerds who were spending their summers taking mechanical engineering classes at MSU, desperately avoiding the only boy who wanted to dance with me.
    Julie Beck is a writer and editor in Chicago.
  • A Brief History Of Opiate Use

    It was with my friends and coworkers at The Pub that I first took morphine. Chris scored a few 30 mg pills and we each washed one down with Budweiser. We kept drinking through the night and the morphine crept in and made for this light, float-y high…
    Jamie Iredell lives in Atlanta where he teaches art students and writes.