Stereotypical People I Find Uncanny

“[The Uncanny] is closely related to Julia Kristeva’s concept of abjection where one reacts adversely to that which has been forcefully cast out of the symbolic order. Abjection can be uncanny in that the observer can recognize something within the abject, possibly of what it was before it was ‘cast out’, yet be repulsed by what it is that made it cast out to begin with.”
Jan. 7, 2011
Brandon Scott Gorrell is a writer and editor living in Brooklyn, NY.

Interlude: The Uncanny Valley

The concept of ‘The Uncanny’ or the ‘Uncanny Valley’ as a sociological or psychological concept was recently introduced to me by my friend when we were talking about people that are stereotypes such as those in this text. I thought it was funny that there’s actually a theory for what I sometimes feel about people. I recently looked it up on Wikipedia – actually for the purpose of finding this article – and most of the discussion around the theory involves robotics.

To the right I have included a graph that depicts the ‘Uncanny Valley’ related to a theory roboticist Mashiro Mori postulated. What it seems to say is that ‘familiarity’ – a sense of being comfortable with something – is safe and even increasing along the range of robots (industrial ones like…cow milkers to maybe a pull-string doll) but quicky drops and becomes “revolting” when a robot (or other thing) get too human-like. “The theory holds that when robots and other facsimiles of humans look and act almost like actual humans, it causes a response of revulsion among human observers,” says the ‘Uncanny Valley’ Wikipedia article. “The ‘valley’ in question is a dip in a proposed graph of the positivity of human reaction as a function of a robot’s lifelikeness.”

It’s a departure from the stereotypical people in this piece, but reading about the Valley and the theory was interesting for me.

People who you are with on the sidewalk that see their friend who you don’t know approaching and stop and talk to that friend for five minutes and never introduce you and don’t include you in the conversation so you just sit there excluded from the conversation until the interaction ends, you never having said anything and leaving without any sort of acknowledgment to the person met on the sidewalk

The effort it takes to greet a friend and then introduce her to a person with you so that the person can be naturally included in the conversation (in the sense that social convention has now been proffered to include the person) is very small and at best a slight consideration. When I am in the position of seeing a friend on the sidewalk that I would like to talk to and I am with another person, one of the most pressing issues for me is to have the other person immediately included in the conversation so as to not create a situation where that person feels excluded or is like a ‘lame ghost.’

Concepts related to this situation are ‘feeling awkward,’ ‘feeling lame,’ ‘being inconsiderate’ and ‘being out-of-control.’

People that wear Ed Hardy

These people seem to be people that would really enjoy Las Vegas and strip clubs. Somehow they also think that Ed Hardy designs (mostly sparkly dragons and skulls) are attractive, so attractive that they will attract others of their sort. That so many people apparently exist that condone Ed Hardy such that Ed Hardy at one point in time went for a lot of money and some celebrities endorsed it is also uncanny to me. Ed Hardy seems like clothes designed by designers that also design clothes sold at Wal-Mart and Super Target.

Concepts related to people that wear Ed Hardy are Las Vegas, Wal-Mart, Super Target, Los Angeles, celebrities and maybe Tommy Lee.

People that are ‘anarchists’

I sincerely do not understand these people and perhaps it is only the result of me simply never reading anything about ‘anarchist theory’ or whatever but for me it would be very embarrassing or I would feel very unseemly if I were to advertise so loudly and blatantly that I was an anarchist, yet live and function in and be dependent on our capitalist, hierarchical society and try to excuse my reliance on “the system” with any excuse at all other than “I am using this system’s resources to prepare a revolution that will change the world into an anarchist society” or “there is a revolution that will change the world into an anarchist society happening right now and I am using this system’s resources to aid it.” I would feel stupid to justify my anti-system philosophy with concepts such as “dumpster diving” and “organic farming communes” because the existence of such concepts as a rule (unless somewhere in Central America, the jungles of Thailand, or [other peoples’ land]) rely on the hierarchical trade systems people have put into place. It would be embarrassing to me, if I were an anarchist, to even to embrace such concepts as gender and to not walk around in formless gender-skewing clothes that I made myself because even concepts such as gender seed natural hierarchies along which power will be distributed and to promote them even in the slightest would be to contribute to “the system.” Basically, the reason I find anarchists uncanny is because, like people that are devout, they seem to be abiding by a worldview that has very large and wide-reaching contradictions. But, I really don’t know all that much about anarchism and ‘anarchists,’ so the fact that I don’t understand these people may be only a result of my ignorance (as are, generally, many human-to-human misunderstandings).

Concepts related to the anarchist stereotype are patches, denim jackets, dumpster diving, organic farming communes, hippies, neo-hippies, zines, the color black, the color red, that “A” symbol in the color black and red, Soviet Russia and army caps.

People in this YouTube Video

I don’t know what this is or why it exists in any form that it has become a thing that if one does ‘right’ others respect them for it. Its subjective grotesqueness, to me, is so visceral that it is hard for me to imagine anyone finding this behavior ‘ok’ but nevertheless the video shows us that there is indeed a collective group of people that find this behavior valiant and appropriate. I do not come from such a place. I don’t understand that place.

Concepts related to the types of people found in the above YouTube video are Glen Beck, Fox News, McDonalds, Wal-Mart, “Rural America,” minivans circa mid-90s, religion, republicans and pigs.

People that have tribal tattoos

I don’t see how people continue to get tribal tattoos. I see how people got them in the 90s. When I was ten I actually thought they were kind of cool. Luckily I wasn’t old enough to get one.

Concepts related to tribal tattoos are Ed Hardy, ‘working out,’ sweatpants, Adidas trainers and orange t-shirts, shiny running shoes, caps with the bills so turned in they make a mostly formed “tube,” tank tops, ‘wife beaters’ and perhaps women in their mid thirties with long blonde hair that were cheerleaders in high school. TC mark

You should follow Thought Catalog on Twitter here.

Intro viaWikipedia

Cataloged in

Text Size:

A | A | A

  • Anonymous

    Serious apostrophe abuse.

  • http://david-fishkind.com David Fishkind

    the possibility that the anonymous shit-talker attached with a respectable ip address is shit-talking in an ironic/sarcastic manner out of boredom or antagonization to fuel [selfish, though not inherently sincere/malicious motive]

  • Anonymous Praise talker

    this is good, i like the psychological and philosophical undertones to this, you should consider writing more stuff like this but maybe bring the undertones to the surface more. thought catalog needs a deep analytical thinker. keep up the good work.

  • http://htmlgiant.com/ Ryan Call
  • Herro

    People with tribal tattoos always remind me of Japanese video game characters I thought were cool when I was ten.

  • http://twitter.com/billApomerans Bill A Pomerans

    a single quotation mark is not an apostrophe

  • http://twitter.com/leighalexander leighalexander

    the possibility that the anonymous shit-talker conducts themselves with a haughty stance of intellectual purity simply to project a persona, possibly for career reasons or to 'control' other people's impressions, etc, despite having a deep well of resentment and distaste toward others that they would like to express occasionally without the associated consequences or without launching a 'big fucking production'

  • http://brianmcelmurry.blogspot.com/ Brian McElmurry

    I feel your empathy for mankind. I mean that. And anonymous shit-talking is lame. I loved the long sentences in the anarchist part. And anarchist don't make sense.

  • Gerry Rice

    damn, why are thoughtcatalogers so politically uneducated?

    while one can't defend the contradictions in the social and theoretical variants of anarchists/anarchism, anarchism can definitely be defended as an “ideal” the same way democracy can be defended as an “ideal.” contradictions do not, hopefully, preclude larger concepts from being valid/desirable.

    e.g. “The DEMOCRATIC People's Republic of Korea” (North Korea) calling itself a democracy probably shouldn’t mean we have to throw out democracy as an ideal.

    There is likewise a fairly obvious problem/contradiction in thinking, say, dumpster diving or stealing from whole foods are politically substantial acts. while it might be practical for the individual, the positive impact it has on society is marginal at best. now, i wouldn’t say being a freegan is wrong/bad/immoral/politically undesirable (in the way making yourself a god-king-autocrat of North Koreans definitely is), but I would say its political utility is so microscopic that it’s almost definitely a waste of time – and possibly, yes, even harmful to the “revolutionary cause.”

    let’s say one tries anyway to resolve the contradictory variants that fall nominally under “anarchism.” i think the philosophical strand that runs through everything from Kropotkin to Crimethinc is salvagable, desirable and is summed up perfectly by Noam Chomsky:

    “That is what I have always understood to be the essence of anarchism: the conviction that the burden of proof has to be placed on authority, and that it should be dismantled if that burden cannot be met.”

    Yes, there are people wasting whole cans of aquanet trying in some oblique way to make this happen, and they may or may not see the larger picture and they probably sully the reputation of anarchism toward alienation of potential converts to radical politics, but hell, who can find anything wrong with challenging honestly illegitimate authority?

  • http://kumquatparadise.tumblr.com aaron nicholas

    “People who you are with on the sidewalk that see their friend who you don’t know approaching and stop and talk to that friend for five minutes and never introduce you and don’t include you in the conversation so you just sit there excluded from the conversation until the interaction ends, you never having said anything and leaving without any sort of acknowledgment to the person met on the sidewalk”

    hate this too, though I have been guilty of it ~3-7 times via not remembering random-passerby-friend's name. in another ~5-8 times I introduced the friend walking with me to the other person without saying names, so they can say their own names, thereby gracefully saving the awkward “I forget your name” moment.

    in retrospect, it could be argued that random-passerby-friend is not actually a friend if the name has been forgotten.

  • um

    isn't this just a list of things you don't like?

  • Ok

    Enjoyed this.

  • Gary Starcher

    Yeah man, at least your shit-talking isn't anonymous.

  • http://popserial.tumblr.com stephen

    lol

    i like “lame ghost,” nice

  • James

    I agree. I don't really know what to say other than I am glad the author at least entertained the notion that he didn't really know what he was talking about (but then why write it/publish it?).

    It is a real fallacy to think that someone can't be in support of an ideal world unless they are doing everything in their power to bring that world in effect.

    Beyond that, the characterization of anarchism in the article is based on knowingly shallow stereotypes that don't attempt to engage it as anything other than a caricature, which doesn't do readers (even of a quasi-satirical, humor, lifestyle website) service.

  • Student

    Ahhh, “people WHO,” not “people THAT”

Recently Cataloged

  • Why 20-Somethings Need To Start Dressing Better

    After spending most of our lives being able to dress however we pleased, we’re now entering a time when we actually have to start considering whether or not an outfit is age-appropriate. When you’re in your mid-twenties though, this can be a surprisingly difficult thing to do.
    Ryan O’Connell is a 25 year-old writer based in the East Village, New York.
  • Three Cheers For "Boring" Love

    In fact, sometimes we are so eager for that thrill of danger, of uncertainty, of desire, that we’ll search for and create problems where there are none. It’s as though our brains can’t comprehend that something can simply work, and that happiness is not just a wisp of smoke we’re meant to perpetually chase and never attain.
    Chelsea is a writer living in Paris.
  • Insane Things I've Said To Women

    Ladies. Please, stop throwing your panties at your computer screens. I don’t mean to be this sexy; it just happens. Even though I’m not a vegetarian, I have a lot of admiration for their kind. To stop eating meat, you are probably either ethical or health-conscious, both of which are appealing traits.
    Josh Gondelman is a writer and comedian who incubated in Boston before moving to New York City.
  • I Wanted To Be A Poem

    The kiss was not well-executed. Our foreheads were interlocked, attempting to preclude the act. She was rubbing my temples, my shoulders, relaxing the malaise out of my muscles, working to my bone marrow. Why did I let her touch me, was I aroused by illogic? No. I wanted to be transcendent, cerebral. I wanted to be a poem.

    J. E. lives and writes in Brooklyn.