5 Ways Lists Are Too Reductive

Dec. 23, 2011
Laura Jayne Martin is a writer living in New York City. Her work has been featured on McSweeney's Internet Tendency, ...

1. Lists breed lists. They whet our appetitive for more lists in the following ways:

a) They are an easy-to-consume portion of information: essentially a Jell-o shot of data

b) They are aesthetically appealing: who doesn’t cringe at a block of text?

c) We can memorize them for later use with our friends: they fit into our head-pockets like thought-iPhones

2. It’s complicated. Lists clobber the life out of long-form journalism, which we sometimes need to, you know, explain stuff. Sometimes the world is complicated and subtle; most good, or at least interesting, stories and situations are like suitcases after a beach trip: they require unpacking. Lists can’t really capture nuance. (Except for: “5 Ways to Capture Nuance This Valentine’s Day!” from last year’s cover of The New England Journal of Contradiction and Roller-skating). But seriously, do you really want to have a relationship, a foreign policy, a biography, or medical advice that is so uncomplicated people can readily understand it via a listicle? If so, look for my upcoming: “Four Easy Ways to Comfort Your Partner on their Grandmother’s Passing!” in January’s issue of The Douchebag’s Companion.

3. Is there a Cliffnotes version of this? The proliferation of lists makes us used to processing lists. What happens when some important instructions appear in non-list form? Be honest with yourself, could you lose five pounds before New Year’s if Guy Stuff Magazine or LadyGirlz Weekly expanded on their three simple tips? What if they just wrote in-depth well-researched articles about ways to integrate fitness into your life because their entire readership probably is not going to drop weight from the same three magic tips?

4. I can’t believe they forgot (blank)! They foster annoying internet debate over what’s missing. Or worse, smarmy smug snarkers will share it with self-congratulatory asides about how they like the thing that’s missing the best. Of course, things are going to be missing from something that is only five things. There are more than five things in the world!

5. Not everything condensed is good. For example, condensed milk tastes like the blood of elves, which is bad. Lists make writers try to squeeze (or stretch) ideas into arbitrary numbers. For instance, I basically covered most of what I’m saying here in point two. What is the last great idea that required no further explanation than five bullet points? Or if it’s the rare light bulb idea (Penicillin cures infection) all you’ll really need is one sentence. Even this straightforward argument could have used a few paragraphs, but alas; this is a list. TC mark

You should follow Thought Catalog on Twitter here.


Cataloged in

Text Size:

A | A | A

  • Robin

    I see what you did there.

    • http://twitter.com/laurajaynemart laura jayne martin

      And *I* see what *you* did there.

  • Asdf

    ‘Or worse, smarmy smug snarkers will share it with self-congratulatory asides about how they like the thing that’s missing the best.’

    This sentence feels dense. It feels like something I’d have typed out in keyboarding class in high school.

    • SYO

      Well aren’t you special. I hope leaving that rude comment made you feel better about yourself .

      • Asdf

        Thank you for the compliment. It wasn’t meant to be rude, so much as to draw an analogy — sentences in keyboarding class feel like they have a certain structure. They typically use alliteration and are heavy on adjectives, both of which the quoted sentence had.  I was using dense in *that* regard.

        I’m happy to know it offended you, but I’d be apologetic if the author herself considered it rude vs constructive criticism. If *she* did, then I apologise to her, but I see no reason to apologise to you.

      • http://twitter.com/laurajaynemart laura jayne martin

        It didn’t offend me.  But thanks SYO, if I don’t already know you let’s be friends.

      • http://www.facebook.com/grc15r Gregory Costa

        Nah, he’s not being rude.  He’s got a valid criticism.  He also got me thinking about how much I miss typing class.    The quick brown fox…

      • ASDF

        dont worry, it did!

  • http://twitter.com/laurahtfraser Laura Fraser

    Hi? Condensed milk is awesome.

  • Hank

    the blood of elves tastes fantastic, btw.  can’t really compare w/ tiger blood, tho.

  • Anonymous

    ELF BLOOOD 

  • cc

    I LOVE condensed milk!!!! I’d eat it every day 4 times a day if it wan’t so fattening.

  • TYPO

    5. *is good.  Come the fuck on.  

    • Anonymous

      oh, jeez. that was my bad.

  • http://www.facebook.com/patrickhuffine Patrick Huffine

    You reading this Ryan O’Connell?

    • http://www.facebook.com/grc15r Gregory Costa

      Ooh.  You’re such a little bitch. 

  • loo

    Here r 5 reasonz i h8 u

    1. u make lists, srsly who does that?
    2. u read cliffnotez? sparknotes, cmon srsly
    3. u frgot so many thigns, y werent there 10? were u tryin 2 condense the list #hipocritsz
    4. lists r my religun so if u dnt liek them i dnt liek u

  • http://twitter.com/eglectic Egle Makaraite

    CONDENSED MILK IS THE DRINK OF GODS YOU FOOL

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recently Cataloged